I know it's a cliche, but I'm blogging from seat 26H of the Lufthansa flight to San Francisco, using their flawless wifi service. And my Sonera Homerun roaming account is picking up a bill for an all-or-nothing €32 for the privelege.
Update: now paying twice, since pc died and i switched to the 770 tablet. the service says i'm still logged in - no timeout! note to self... however, good news is i'm loving the 770. excellent for reading blogs, and the internet radio works a charm - listening to lateshift on virgin now...
Tuesday, October 04, 2005
Sunday, October 02, 2005
Will someone please create a good feedreader?
So, I've been getting increasingly frustrated about Bloglines. It's as if the founders cut and run the minute that Ask Jeeves bought them...
The Rant
We are moving from a web of searching through archives on big screens to syndicating to information about people places and things that matter to you. (And this will be on mobile devices rather than the big screen of course). And what tools do we have at our disposal? The modest feedreader. I haven't met one I liked. The crazy thing is that the same tool is needed in the enterprise and consumer space, for informing and for entertaining. So about all of the waking hours of those Web junkies that tend to influence things. Everything else (desktop apps, search engines) could be second fiddle to this interface if it is done well. I'm surprised at how little innovation there seems to be here.
The landscape
Frankly, it's thin pickings. Bloglines is so creaky I get frustrated everytime I go there, and wish they would hire some ajax / Ruby on Rails programmers. It's hard for me to easily delete and add feeds, no intelligence in presenting my feeds, no filtering... Firefox's sage is a bit better, but I have often have issues with Firefox (remembering passwords, getting stuck with firewalls etc). SharpReader and Newsgator do the plain vanilla OK but they are PC based (and NetNewsWire is Apple only), but I need it to be web-based. Google and MyYahoo are dabbling but have not delivered the kind of smooth experience that makes sense. In short, 37signals' Basecamp comes close to the user experience (not surprising since they basically invented Ruby on Rails) and I hope they are planning something like this.
(Similarly, blog creation tools are fairly flaky, but I guess that's going to have to be another post. The way that typepad allows the browser to navigate away from the post under construction (e.g. if you click a link in another app or hit the 'page back' button on the keyboard) has caused me to bounce off the ceiling numerous times. In that category, a good simple seems to be Ecto which lets you compose on the PC then post, but it shouldn't have to be a PC app.)
Hopefully some of the new web2.0 tools - such as findory, rollyo, loomia and other machine-generated names - will make strides in the right direction. I guess more announcements will be made at this week's event.
Update: Google just launched google.com/reader here at Web2.0. My first impressions about this are not that great - confusing UI, delays and minimal features. OK it does tags, but still. C'mon Google, impress us.
The Rant
We are moving from a web of searching through archives on big screens to syndicating to information about people places and things that matter to you. (And this will be on mobile devices rather than the big screen of course). And what tools do we have at our disposal? The modest feedreader. I haven't met one I liked. The crazy thing is that the same tool is needed in the enterprise and consumer space, for informing and for entertaining. So about all of the waking hours of those Web junkies that tend to influence things. Everything else (desktop apps, search engines) could be second fiddle to this interface if it is done well. I'm surprised at how little innovation there seems to be here.
The landscape
Frankly, it's thin pickings. Bloglines is so creaky I get frustrated everytime I go there, and wish they would hire some ajax / Ruby on Rails programmers. It's hard for me to easily delete and add feeds, no intelligence in presenting my feeds, no filtering... Firefox's sage is a bit better, but I have often have issues with Firefox (remembering passwords, getting stuck with firewalls etc). SharpReader and Newsgator do the plain vanilla OK but they are PC based (and NetNewsWire is Apple only), but I need it to be web-based. Google and MyYahoo are dabbling but have not delivered the kind of smooth experience that makes sense. In short, 37signals' Basecamp comes close to the user experience (not surprising since they basically invented Ruby on Rails) and I hope they are planning something like this.
(Similarly, blog creation tools are fairly flaky, but I guess that's going to have to be another post. The way that typepad allows the browser to navigate away from the post under construction (e.g. if you click a link in another app or hit the 'page back' button on the keyboard) has caused me to bounce off the ceiling numerous times. In that category, a good simple seems to be Ecto which lets you compose on the PC then post, but it shouldn't have to be a PC app.)
Hopefully some of the new web2.0 tools - such as findory, rollyo, loomia and other machine-generated names - will make strides in the right direction. I guess more announcements will be made at this week's event.
Anyway, here are some suggestions for a good feedreader:
- One click sorting and filtering along the following axes:
-- frequency - that I read them (default, most read rise to the top so I can easily cull the stuff at the bottom)
-- alphabetical - the name of the podcast
-- date added - when I added it
-- readership - the size of their audience
-- tags - so i can create categories on the fly - Easy flagging and tagging for later personal storage, management or sharing.
- Use Ajax / Ruby on Railsto allow drag and drop e.g. to add feeds or throw away feeds you're no longer interested in (Apple-esque - would be nice to have a puff of smoke too).
- Collaborative filters - guide me by what other people are viewing. Ideally, even communities that I create myself.
- Smooth integration between blogs and podcasts - they're the same thing, when you have Blinkx turning video into text and text to speech.
- Smooth integration with my mobile device - I can read and edit my feeds from either, and they will be updated on both. I can save clips / stories from my feeds on my mobile without leaving the page and marking all the feeds as read (as in mobile.bloglines.com)
- Ability to change the rules for certain blogs as 'I'm really interested in this' and if anything is posted here, send me an SMS, MMS, email or carrier pigeon (tick as appropriate). Same for when someone comments on my blog for blog creation tools
- Transparent collaborative filters - don't just tell me what you think I'll like. Let me build up my suggestions from you in stages. Give me the top 50 feeds based on [Tech] and / or [mention "mobiles" ] and / or [come from India ] and / or [are read and rated by people I rate]
Update: Google just launched google.com/reader here at Web2.0. My first impressions about this are not that great - confusing UI, delays and minimal features. OK it does tags, but still. C'mon Google, impress us.
What is Web 2.0 2.0?
My answer? Web 2.0 = Web Bubble 2.0 = Bubbly 2.0. I want some. Om has others:
Last night, I was at a dinner, where one of the topics of discussion was Web 2.0. More appropriately, what is Web 2.0? It is a damn fine question, and difficult one to answer. D. Keith Robinson writes, “Depending on who’s using the term, you could be talking about the Web as a platform for applications, a philosophy in building and designing Web applications, a group of powerful Web technologies, and much more.” Mark Sigal says, “At the core, it is an applied web service model that blurs the line between software and service.”
Dave Winer says, “Web 2.0 is a marketing concept used by venture capitalists and conference promoters to try to call another bubble into existence.” Richard McManus has his own take here.
From my perspective, I define Web 2.0 as a “collection of technologies - be it VoIP, Digital Media, XML, RSS, Google Maps… whatever …. that leverage the power of always on, high speed connections and treat broadband as a platform, and not just a pipe to connect.” Clearly, Web 2.0 is different and many things to many people. What is your definition? How do you view it? Curious to find out, especially before next week’s Web 2.0 conference.
Am excited to be going to Web 2.0. Not because of any major new insights or product launches (cheaper and more efficient to just read the blogs) but because to be at what should be an electrically-hyper event, of the kind I missed out when I was discussing trade policy over long lunches at the European Commission in the Web1.0 bubble at Millenium's end.
Last night, I was at a dinner, where one of the topics of discussion was Web 2.0. More appropriately, what is Web 2.0? It is a damn fine question, and difficult one to answer. D. Keith Robinson writes, “Depending on who’s using the term, you could be talking about the Web as a platform for applications, a philosophy in building and designing Web applications, a group of powerful Web technologies, and much more.” Mark Sigal says, “At the core, it is an applied web service model that blurs the line between software and service.”
Dave Winer says, “Web 2.0 is a marketing concept used by venture capitalists and conference promoters to try to call another bubble into existence.” Richard McManus has his own take here.
From my perspective, I define Web 2.0 as a “collection of technologies - be it VoIP, Digital Media, XML, RSS, Google Maps… whatever …. that leverage the power of always on, high speed connections and treat broadband as a platform, and not just a pipe to connect.” Clearly, Web 2.0 is different and many things to many people. What is your definition? How do you view it? Curious to find out, especially before next week’s Web 2.0 conference.
Am excited to be going to Web 2.0. Not because of any major new insights or product launches (cheaper and more efficient to just read the blogs) but because to be at what should be an electrically-hyper event, of the kind I missed out when I was discussing trade policy over long lunches at the European Commission in the Web1.0 bubble at Millenium's end.
Friday, September 30, 2005
Bill Joy calls mobile Internet the 'here' web
When will there be more wireless Internet users than wired? Mid 2007 would be my guess.
Bill Joy is putting his money--or, more accurately, his VC firm's money--on the Web as the platform of the future.Joy, co-founder of Sun Microsystems and a driving force behind the creation of Berkeley Unix and Java, among other technologies, said the explosion in devices like cell phones, PDAs and other wireless gadgets connected to the Web is radically changing the technology industry.He calls that phenomenon the "here" Web, because the Internet is always "here, because you access it through a device you always carry."
Link: http://news.com.com/Joy+Future+of+the+Web+is+mobile+devices/2100-1016_3-5885769.html?tag=nefd.top
Tuesday, September 27, 2005
Monday, September 26, 2005
There's a moose loose
Story about True Blue - another good find via Jyri:
True Blue Love is a mobile phone social networking experience, designed to explore the politics behind intimate phone-based relations. Designed as a program for mobile phones; each participant enters into the program the characteristics of their ideal sexual mate, chosen from a series of preset selections. While the program is running, every time another phone comes within range, a love metric is calculated which is a representation of how close the incoming person matches the participant's ideal mate. If the match is close, the phone will emit a raucous mating call that will be unique to that participant.
Cute idea, but I can't see it taking off - surely the idea is to use the phone to solve the problem of embarassing human interactions not make them more acute...! My modest proposal would be to shift the focus onto a shared common experience, such as music, that one can happily discuss without embarassment. It's easier to say, 'So, you like the libertines too?" than "So, you are desperate too?".
Monday, September 19, 2005
I want to break free
From Jyri:
Three, the UK operator, sells 3G contracts but doesn't tell its customers that it blocks them from accessing the internet.
Al Iguana shares the experience: I got an amazing new phone, a Nokia 6680. Symbian 60, dual camera… you can read reviews of it all over the internet. Superb bit of kit. My wonder-phone has a flaw. a serious flaw. because I’m on Three. I can’t access the internet. They’ve blocked it. No blog clients. No RSS readers. No Wap. All I can do is visit Three’s website. A Pay website. Want to read the news? Each item costs 50p. The weather? 50p. OUT-FUCKING-RAGEOUS!!! So I have all this stuff on the phone, Opera, Lifeblog, Yahoo Messenger, and I can’t use it. Whats the point of that?? quote Three: “Due to a business decision 3 have chosen to promote a great range of products and services available via the 3 browser instead of offering open internet access Open internet access is something we are currently looking at, however, I can provide you with no definite information at this time.”
In the comments to the post it is noted that 3 offers open Internet in other European countries, just not the UK.
Three, the UK operator, sells 3G contracts but doesn't tell its customers that it blocks them from accessing the internet.
Al Iguana shares the experience: I got an amazing new phone, a Nokia 6680. Symbian 60, dual camera… you can read reviews of it all over the internet. Superb bit of kit. My wonder-phone has a flaw. a serious flaw. because I’m on Three. I can’t access the internet. They’ve blocked it. No blog clients. No RSS readers. No Wap. All I can do is visit Three’s website. A Pay website. Want to read the news? Each item costs 50p. The weather? 50p. OUT-FUCKING-RAGEOUS!!! So I have all this stuff on the phone, Opera, Lifeblog, Yahoo Messenger, and I can’t use it. Whats the point of that?? quote Three: “Due to a business decision 3 have chosen to promote a great range of products and services available via the 3 browser instead of offering open internet access Open internet access is something we are currently looking at, however, I can provide you with no definite information at this time.”
In the comments to the post it is noted that 3 offers open Internet in other European countries, just not the UK.
Sunday, September 18, 2005
First Past the Post
This blog is going to be looking at what happens when the Internet goes mobile, bumps into people and veritably collides with the media industry.
It will be sporadic, of wildy varying quality, and the posts will be liberally doused with inpenetrable English asides, tossed in pretension and given a light sprinkling of off-topic rants. These are all my own words, and not those of past or present employers.
It will be sporadic, of wildy varying quality, and the posts will be liberally doused with inpenetrable English asides, tossed in pretension and given a light sprinkling of off-topic rants. These are all my own words, and not those of past or present employers.